For the last seven years, my research projects have mostly revolved around activist media (noun) or media activism (verb). Sometimes these two phenomena are the same, sometimes they are not. Occasionally, an activist media text falls upon deft ears with no engagement beyond the viewing experience and conversely, media activism can emerge from the most unlikely of media events. In contemporary times, exploring and drawing the boundaries for understanding the engagement between activism and the media is tricky theoretical business. And now, my task is to narrow and focus what I am speaking about when I say “activist documentary.” One of the questions at the forefront of my mind is: How does one recognize, identify and label activist documentary? Or, in other words, how do you know it when you see it?
It was interesting to talk to people who are working on the ground, making and distributing activist media, about the function and character of these texts. Brian Drolet at Deep Dish TV in New York City had this to say:
The two interesting markers that Brian identifies are abstract but incredibly important to this discussion: that activist media (or what he terms parellel media), it is a truth telling mechanism and gives voice to the voiceless in society. In both of these characterizations, the process of political struggle is forgrounded and activist media is the megaphone of the marginalized. Which begs the question, what kind of connection must activist media have to the project of activism and the people who extend and struggle on behalf of the political work identified by an activist media text?
